Juvenile Criminal Responsibility in Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations in Indonesia and Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.387Keywords:
Children, Juvenile Justice, Legal Pluralism, Legal Hermeneutics, Living LawAbstract
This study explores the intersection balance between legal frameworks and customary obligations in the imposition of additional punishment by judges, particularly in the context of juvenile justice in Indonesia. As a normative-legal research, this study employs philosophical, theoretical, and conceptual approaches to examine how juvenile criminal justice systems of Indonesia and Australia, with focus on the Provinces of Bali and West Papua, where indigenous and local knowledge play a significant role in shaping judicial decisions. The findings reveal that Indonesian judges incorporate theological, sociological, and legal considerations when determining juvenile criminal responsibility. By blending community norms with legal principles, they aim to ensure justice that aligns with societal values. This approach underscores the significance of harmonizing legal decisions with local cultural expectations, fostering a restorative justice model that prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. In contrast, Australia’s juvenile justice system emphasizes formal legal procedures and rehabilitation but does not integrate local cultural norms as extensively as Indonesia. By comparing these two systems, the study provides valuable insights into how legal frameworks can adapt to diverse cultural contexts while upholding universal principles of justice. This research enriches the global discourse on juvenile justice, highlighting Indonesia's experience as a compelling example of a legal system striving for justice through a culturally sensitive and restorative approach.
References
Legal document:
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 17 of 2016 on the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection.
Judgement Number 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mnk, Manokwari District Court, West Papua, Indonesia.
Judgement Number 138/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Denpasar, Denpasar District Court, Bali, Indonesia.
Books, Reports, and articles:
Australian Institute of Criminology. "Young People and Crime: An Overview of Current and Future Issues." Research and Public Policy Series No. 31, 2003.
Australian Law Reform Commission. Seen and Heard: Priority for Children in the Legal Process. Report No. 84, 1997.
Bodenheimer, Edgar. Jurisprudence: The philosophy and method of the law. Harvard University Press, 1974.
Bowen, John R. Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Cipriani, Don. Children”s Rights and the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility: A Global Perspective. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2009.
Crofts, Thomas. The Criminal Responsibility of Children and Young Persons: A Comparison of English and German Law. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.
Cunneen, Chris. Arguments for Raising the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2020.
Don Cipriani. Children’s Rights and the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility: A Global Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
Faisal, Faisal, Sri Rahayu, Derita Prapti Rahayu, Anri Darmawan, and Andri Yanto. "Progressive Consideration of Judges in Deciding Sentencing Under Indonesia New Criminal Code." Jambe Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2023): 85-102.
Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.
Huang, Gui. "A Paradox of Student Bullying Prevention in China: Between Social Anxiety and the Reaction to it." Hasanuddin Law Review 8, no. 3 (2022): 258-287.
Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.
Lev, Daniel S. Legal Evolution and Political Authority in Indonesia: Selected Essays. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
Linda C. Fentiman. "Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America”s Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse Is Not the Answer—A Comparative Legal Analysis." Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 15, no. 2 (2009): 389-486.
Mark R. Fondacaro, Christopher Slobogin, and Tricia Cross. "Reconceptualizing Due Process in Juvenile Justice: Contributions from Law and Social Science." Hastings Law Journal 57, no. 5 (2006): 955-1006.
Merry, Sally Engle. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Michael Freeman, “The Best Interests of the Child? Is the Best Interests of the Child in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Human Rights Law?" International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11, no. 3 (1997): 360-388.
Rudy, Rudi Natamiharja, Jalil Alejandro Magaldi Sernac, and Ahmad Syofyan. "Implementation of Civil Rights against Vulnerable Groups in the Legal and Constitutional System in Indonesia." Hasanuddin Law Review 8, no. 3 (2022): 299-309.
Steinberg, Laurence. Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2009.
Sujana, I Nyoman, and Irma Rachmawati Maruf. "The Constitutionality of Inheritance Rights for Extramarital Children: Assessing the Legal Response under Balinese Customary Law." Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 83-93.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. A. General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 2008.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 24: Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice (2019).
United Nations General Assembly, "Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice ("The Beijing Rules")," Resolution 40/33, November 29, 1985.
Walsh, Tamara, Robin Fitzgerald, Lucy Cornwell, and Cara Scarpato. "Raise the age-and then what?: Exploring the alternatives of criminalising children under 14 years of age." James Cook University Law Review 27 (2021): 37-56.
William Schabas. The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Yunus, Ahsan. "Multilayered democracy in Papua: A comparison of “Noken” system and Electoral College system in the United States." Hasanuddin Law Review 6, no. 3 (2020): 232-239.
Zaituni, Riza Nizarli, and M. Yakub Aiyub Kadir. "Non-Penal Policy of Syariah Institutions in Preventing Juveniles from Narcotics Abuse in Aceh Province, Indonesia." Jambe Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2021): 21-41.
