Judicial Preclusion in International Arbitration: Comparative Analysis of UK, Australia, and Malaysia’s Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.385Keywords:
judicial preclusion, enforcement of foreign awards, New York Convention 1958, finality of arbitral awards, international arbitrationAbstract
This paper examines the issue of judicial preclusion in international arbitration, focusing on whether an award-debtor’s failure to challenge a foreign award at the supervisory court precludes them from contesting the enforcement of an award in another jurisdiction. Through a comparative analysis of judicial practices in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Malaysia, the study evaluates the extent of harmonisation in the application of Article V of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (NYC 1958). The findings reveal divergences: while UK and Australian courts adopt a flexible approach, allowing enforcement-stage challenges irrespective of prior actions at the supervisory court, Malaysian courts demonstrate a strong pro-enforcement bias, often deferring to the decisions of the supervisory court and restricting opportunities for re-litigation. This paper engages with the theories of res judicata and finality, exploring their interplay with judicial discretion and highlighting the tension between fairness and the finality of arbitration awards. It concludes with critical recommendations for enhancing harmonisation under the NYC 1958, including clearer guidelines on judicial preclusion, the integration of international best practices, and reforms to balance enforcement predictability and certainty in international arbitration
References
Adi, Emmanuel Ariananto Waluyo. "Penal Mediation as the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code." Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46704.
Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ashapura Minechem Ltd [2016] 9 CLJ 709
Archer Daniels Midland Co v TTH Global (M) Sdn Bhd [2016] 1 LNS 1282
Badah, Saad. "The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the Gcc Countries: Focus on Kuwait." International Law Research 3, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v3n1p24.
Bantekas, Ilias. "Court-Ordered Interim Measures in International Arbitration: A Comparative Approach." Journal of Law and Commerce 41, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5195/jlc.2023.257.
Basirat, Abdul Nabi, and Mohammad Aimal Haqmal. "Public Policy as a Ground for Refusing Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: New York Convention, Uncitral Model Law and Afghanistan Arbitration Law Perspectives." American Journal of Law and Political Science 2, no. 3 (2023): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.58425/ajlps.v2i3.185.
Berg, Albert Jan van der. "Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award Be Abolished?". ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 29, no. 2 (2014): 263-88.
Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, Martin Hunter, and Alan Redfern. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Born, Gary. International Arbitration : Law and Practice. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2016.
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46
Davidson, W., and S. Rajoo. "The New Malaysian Arbitration Regime 2005." Malayan Law Journal Articles 4 (2006): cxxx.
Gupta, Ritunjay. "Res Judicata in International Arbitration: Choice of Law, Competence &Amp; Jurisdictional Court Decisions." Asian International Arbitration Journal 16, no. Issue 2 (2020): 193-220. https://doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2020021.
Harder, Sirko. "Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in Australia against Non-Signatories of the Arbitration Agreement." Asian International Arbitration Journal 8, no. 2 (2012): 131-60.
Hathout, Takyeddine, Rohana Abdul Rahman, and Mohd Zakhiri Md Nor. "The Role of International Commercial Arbitration in Enhancing Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons for Algeria." Uum Journal of Legal Studies 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.11.2.2020.6949.
Henderson v Henderson (1843) 67 Eng. Rep. 313
Idid, Syed Ahmad, and Umar A. Oseni. "Appointing a Non-Muslim as Arbitrator in Tahkim Proceedings: Polemics, Perceptions and Possibilities." Malayan Law Journal Articles 5 (2014): xvi-xvi.
Idid, Syed Ahmad, and Umar A. Oseni. "The Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2011: Limiting Court Intervention in Arbitral Proceedings in Malaysia." Malayan Law Journal Articles 2 (2014): cxxxii-cxxxii.
IMC Aviation Solutions Pty Ltd v Altain Khuder LLC [2011] VSCA 248
IPL Middle East DMCC v KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd [2022] MLJU 136
Kurniawan, I. Gede Agus. "Digitalization of Business Law: Urgency and Orientation of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0." Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 5, no. 2 (12/20 2022): 253-65. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6847.
Lew, Julian D. M., Loukas A. Mistelis, and Stefan Kröll. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague ; London: Kluwer Law International, 2003.
Liebscher, Christoph. "Article V(1)(E)." In The New York Convention: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Article by Article Commentary, edited by Reinmar Wolff, 370-70: Verlag C. H. Beck oHG, Hart Publishing & Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co., 2019.
Mohamed, Abdul Majid Tahir, Maheran Makhtar, Noor ‘Ashikin Hamid, and Khairun-Nisaa Asari. "Arbitration as a Method of Dispute Settlement in Islamic Banking and Finance: A Perspective from Malaysian Governing Law." Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum 23, no. S (2015): 153.
Nazzini, Renato. "Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards: Res Judicata, Issues Estoppel, and Abuse of Process in a Transnational Context." American Journal of Comparative Law 66, no. 3 (2018): 603-38.
Nyathore, Paul Mathenge, Gituro Wainaina, Zachary Bolo Awino, and James Thuo Kariuki. "Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems: The Case of Public Procurement Bid Disputes Management in Kenyap." International Journal of Professional Business Review 9, no. 1 (2024): e04200. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i1.4200.
Ojiako, Udechukwu. "The Finality Principle in Arbitration: A Theoretical Exploration." Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 15, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000573.
Paulsson, Marike. The 1958 New York Convention in Action. Kluwer Law International, 2016.
Puspita, Lona, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Afifah Kusumadara, and Setyo Widagdo. "The Dilemma of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia." International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 114-21. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i1.745.
Rajoo, S. "Internationalisation through Institutional Arbitration : The Malaysian Success Story." In International Arbitration Discourse and Practices in Asia, edited by V. K. Bhatia: London, England; New York, New York : Routledge, 2018.
Rajoo, Sundra. "Towards Broader Adoption and Uniform Interpretation of the New York Convention – a Malaysian Perspective." Malayan Law Journal Articles 3 (2013): cxivi.
Rajoo, Sundra. "Towards Broader Adoption and Uniform Interpretation of the New York Convention – a Malaysian Perspective." Malayan Law Journal Articles 3 (2013): cxivi-cxivi.
Rosli, Iyllyana Che. "International Commercial Arbitration in Malaysia." Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29, no. S2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s2.10.
Simões, Fernando Dias. "Harmonisation of Arbitration Laws in the Asia- Pacific: Trendy or Necessary?". In Trade Development through Harmonization of Commercial Law, edited by Muruga Perumal Ramaswamy and João Ribeiro: UNCITRAL Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific, New Zealand Association for Comparative Law, 2015.
Siregar, Taufik, Khsan Lubis, and Abdul Yaser Ihutan Siregar. "Executorial Power of Arbitration Institution in Business Disputes." International Journal of Research and Review 10, no. 7 (2023): 599-607. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230771.
Suryana, Muchamad Iksan, Agus Prihartono Ps, and Anne Gunawati. "Legal Review Relating to Cancellation of Arbitration Awards That Are Already Powerful (Inkracht) and Final Related to Arbitration Law No. 30 of 1999 Concerning Arbitration Case Study Pt. Krakatau Posco against Indonesian National Arbitration Board, Dkk at Serang State Court." JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) 11, no. 2 (2023): 222. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v11i2.8391.
Tarawneh, Mosleh A., and Tariq K. Alhasan. "Between Commitment and Reality: A Critical Examination of Jordan's Adherence to the New York Convention 1958." Conflict Resolution Quarterly 41, no. 4 (2024): 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21419.
Teixeira, Dinis Braz. "Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention." Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 8, no. 1 (2019): 1-48.
Yalabik, Fulya Teomete. "The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 Regarding Challenges of Awards Make London an Attractive Hub?". Annales De La Faculté De Droit D’istanbul 0, no. 0 (2021): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.3220.
Yukos Oil Co v Dardana Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ. 543
Zhang, Yuxin. "The Growing Impotance of International Arbitration in International Commerce." BCP Business & Management 27 (2022): 301-04. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v27i.1976.
